1. Liker, J.K., The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. 2004, New York: McGraw-Hill. xxii, 330 p.
2. Sugimori, Y., et al., Toyota production system and kanban system. Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. International Journal of Production Research, 1977. 15(6): p. 553-564.
3. Womack, J.P., D.T. Jones, and D. Roos, The machine that changed the world. 1991, New York, NY: Harper Perennial. viii, 323 p.
4. Womack, J.P. and D.T. Jones, Lean thinking : banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. 1996, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. 350 p.
5. New, S.J., Celebrating the enigma: The continuing puzzle of the Toyota Production System. International Journal of Production Research, 2007. 45(16): p. 3545-3554.
6. Shah, R. and P.T. Ward, Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 2003. 21(2): p. 129-149.
7. Lander, E. and J.K. Liker, The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. International Journal of Production Research, 2007. 45(16): p. 3681 – 3698.
8. Parker, M. and J. Slaughter, Choosing sides: unions and the team concept. 1988, Cambridge MA: South End Press.
9. Hampson, I., Lean production and the toyota production system – Or, the case of the forgotten production concepts. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1999. 20(3): p. 369-391.
10. Monden, Y., Toyota production system : an integrated approach to just-in-time. 2nd ed. 1994, London: Chapman & Hall. xvii, 423 p.
11. Smith, P.G. and D.G. Reinertsen, Developing products in half the time. 1991, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. xix, 298 p.
12. Baines, T., et al., State-of-the-art in lean design engineering: A literature review on white collar lean. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2006. 220(9): p. 1538-1547.
13. Chase, J.P., Value Creation in the Product Development Process, in Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2001, MIT: Cambridge, MA.
14. Haque, B. and M. James-Moore, Applying Lean Thinking to new product introduction. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004. 15(1): p. 1-31.
15. McManus, H.L., A. Haggerty, and E. Murman, Lean engineering: A framework for doing the right thing right. Aeronautical Journal, 2007. 111(1116): p. 105-114.
16. Hines, P., M. Francis, and P. Found, Towards lean product lifecycle management: A framework for new product development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2006. 17(7): p. 866-887.
17. Oppenheim, B.W., Lean product development flow. Systems Engineering, 2004. 7(4): p. 352-376.
18. Freire, J. and L.F. Alarcón, Achieving lean design process: Improvement methodology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2002. 128(3): p. 248-256.
19. Liker, J.K. and J.M. Morgan, The toyota way in services: The case of lean product development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2006. 20(2): p. 5-20.
20. Sobek, D.K., A.C. Ward, and J.K. Liker, Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1999. 40(2): p. 67-83.
21. Ford, D.N. and D.K. Sobek, Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the Second Toyota Paradox. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52(2): p. 175-185.
22. Cooper, R.G. and E.J. Kleinschmidt, Determinants of timeliness in product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1994. 11(5): p. 381-396.
23. Griffin, A., Product development cycle time for business-to-business products. Industrial Marketing Management, 2002. 31(4): p. 291-304.
24. Chen, J., R.R. Reilly, and G.S. Lynn, The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: The moderating effects of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52(2): p. 199-212.
25. Langerak, F. and E.J. Hultink, The impact of product innovativeness on the link between development speed and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006. 23(3): p. 203-214.
26. Kessler, E.H. and P.E. Bierly, Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2002. 49(1): p. 2-12.
27. Ali, A., The Impact of Innovativeness and Development Time on New Product Performance for Small Firms. Marketing Letters, 2000. 11(2): p. 151-163.
28. Ledwith, A., Management of new product development in small electronics firms. Journal of European Industrial Training, 2000. 24(2/3/4).
29. Crawford, C.M., The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992. 9(3): p. 188-199.
30. Smith, P.G. and D.G. Reinertsen, Developing products in half the time : new rules, new tools. [New ed. 1998, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. xix, 298 p.
31. Langerak, F. and E.J. Hultink, The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52(1): p. 30-42.
32. Langerak, F., E. Peelen, and E. Nijssen, A laddering approach to the use of methods and techniques to reduce the cycle time of new-to-the-firm products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1999. 16(2): p. 173-182.
33. Cooper, R.G., From experience: The invisible success factors in product innovation. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1999. 16(2): p. 115.
34. Smith, P.G., Accelerated product development: techniques and traps, in The PDMA handbook of new product development, K.B. Kahn, Editor. 2005, Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
35. OECD, SME Statistics: Towards a More Systematic Statistical Measurement of SME Behaviour. 2004, OECD.36. Ministry of Economic Development, SMEs in New Zealand: structure and dynamics – July 2007, M.o.E. Development, Editor. 2007, Ministry of Economic Development.
37. European Commission, Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 2005. L124: p. 6.
38. US Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry Classification System Codes, U.S.B. Administration, Editor. 2006.
39. Dickson, P., et al., Managing design in small high-growth companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1995. 12(5): p. 406.
40. Chan, Y.E., N. Bhargava, and C.T. Street, Having Arrived: The Homogeneity of High-Growth Small Firms*. Journal of Small Business Management, 2006. 44(3): p. 426-440.
41. Curran, J. and R.A. Blackburn, Researching the small enterprise. 2001, London: Sage Publications.
42. Curran, J. and J. Stanworth, Small firms, large firms: Theoretical and research strategies for the comparative analysis of small and large firms”, in Small firms: growth and development, M. Scott, et al., Editors. 1986, Gower: Aldershot.
43. Rothwell, R., Small firms, innovation and industrial change. Small Business Economics, 1989. 1(1): p. 51-64.
44. Repenning, N.P., Understanding fire fighting in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001. 18(5): p. 285-300.
45. Repenning, N.P., P. Gonçalves, and L.J. Black, Past the tipping point: The persistence of firefighting in product development. California Management Review, 2001(4): p. 44-63.
46. Rudolph, J.W. and N.P. Repenning, Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002. 47(1): p. 1-30.
47. Boehm, B.W. and R. Turner, Balancing agility and discipline : a guide for the perplexed. 2004, Boston: Addison-Wesley.
48. Project Management Institute., A guide to the project management body of knowledge : PMBOK guide. 3rd ed. 2004, Newtown Square, Pa.: Project Management Institute. viii, 390 p.
49. Morris, P.W.G. and G.H. Hough, The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. 1987, New York: Wiley.
50. Whittaker, B., What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management and Computer Security, 1999. 7(1): p. 23-29.
51. Chaos Chronicles Version 3.0. 2003, The Standish Group: West Yarmouth, MA.
52. Eden, C., F. Ackermann, and T. Williams, The amoebic growth of project costs Project Management Journal, 2005. 36(2): p. 15.
53. Williams, T., Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52(4): p. 497-508.
54. Jepsen, O. Agile bevægelsen. Agile udvikling –endnu ensilver bullet? 2005
55. Little, T., Context-adaptive agility: managing complexity and uncertainty. Software, IEEE, 2005. 22(3): p. 28-35.
56. Dvir, D. and T. Lechler, Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success.33(1): p. 1-15. Research Policy, 2004.
57. Crawford, L. and J. Pollack, Hard and soft projects: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 2004. 22(8): p. 645-653.
58. De Meyer, A., C.H. Loch, and M.T. Pich, Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2002. 43(2): p. 60.
59. Pich, M.T., C.H. Loch, and A. De Meyer, On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.48(8): p. 1008-1023. Management Science, 2002.
60. Dvir, D., et al., In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy, 1998. 27(9): p. 915-935.
61. Cockburn, A., Software development as a cooperative game, in Object Active conference. 1999: Midrand.
62. Ahituv, N. and S. Neumann, A flexible approach to information system development. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 1984. 8(2): p. 69-78.
63. Cockburn, A., Selecting a project’s methodology. Software, IEEE, 2000. 17(4): p. 64-71.
64. Boehm, B. and R. Turner, Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer, 2003. 36(6): p. 57-66.
65. Little, T., Context-adaptive agility: managing complexity and uncertainty. Software, IEEE, 2005. 22(3): p. 28-35.
66. Jepsen, O. and A.B. Jorgensen, Project Analyzer, in Flexible product development : building agility for changing markets, P.G. Smith. 2007, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco. p. xiii, 286 p.
67. Checkland, P., Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2000. 17(SUPPL.).
68. Office of Government Commerce, Tailoring PRINCE2 2002, London: The Stationary Office.
69. Pich, M.T., C.H. Loch, and A. De Meyer, On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.48(8): p. 1008-1023. Management Science, 2002.
70. Johnston, T.D., Selective costs and benefits of in the evolution of learning, in Adaptive individuals in evolving populations: models and algorithms. 1996, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. p. 315-358.
71. Chaos Chronicles Version 3.0. 2003, The Standish Group: West Yarmouth, MA.
72. Morris, P.W.G. and G.H. Hough, The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. 1987, New York: Wiley.
73. Eden, C., F. Ackermann, and T. Williams, The amoebic growth of project costs Project Management Journal, 2005. 36(2): p. 15.
74. Whittaker, B., What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management and Computer Security, 1999. 7(1): p. 23-29.
75. Williams, T., Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52(4): p. 497-508.
76. Lyneis, J.M. and D.N. Ford, System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 2007. 23(2-3): p. 157-189.
77. Wadeson, N., Projects as search processes. International Journal of Project Management, 2005. 23(6): p. 421-427.
78. Simonet, S. and G.J.S. Wilde, Risk: Perception, acceptance and homeostasis. Applied Psychology, 1997. 46(3): p. 235-252.
79. Pender, S., Managing incomplete knowledge: Why risk management is not sufficient. International Journal of Project Management, 2001. 19(2): p. 79-87.
